I woke up this morning reflecting on the chaos in the world today and how chaos was sometimes reflected in artistic movements throughout history.
Art, like life, often swings between chaos and meaning, between playful nonsense and profound connection. This tension can be seen in the Surrealist movement — a movement born from the desire to tap into the subconscious, the irrational, and the dream-like. But which dreams did it value? And whose voices shaped its legacy?
The Fragmented Dreams of the Male Surrealists
When I first encountered Surrealism in my college art history classes, the spotlight belonged almost exclusively to men — Salvador Dalí, René Magritte, Max Ernst. Their works were undeniably fascinating: melting clocks, impossible landscapes, strange juxtapositions.
These dreamscapes were playful, clever, and sometimes disturbing. But something was missing.
The dream realms they created felt detached from meaning — untethered from the heart and soul. They presented images for the sake of juxtaposition, with no invitation to connect emotionally or spiritually. Perhaps it was a reflection of the sensitive male soul forced to live in an industrial world view that felt meaningless to them and this was their way of rebelling – by going against the grain. They reflected a very particular worldview — one rooted in absurdity, irony, and often, a subtle (or not-so-subtle) nihilism. Life, in these paintings, was a riddle with no answer — fascinating, yes, but somehow incomplete.
The Hidden Feminine Surrealists — and the Return of Meaning
It wasn’t until a female professor introduced me to the work of Remedios Varo that I realized there was another side to Surrealism — one my art history books had completely ignored.
Varo’s paintings were just as strange and dreamlike, but they carried a luminous thread of meaning running through them. Her worlds weren’t just collections of unrelated objects — they were enchanted spaces where human figures, animals, and ethereal beings collaborated in weaving the fabric of reality itself. Women weren’t fragmented bodies or passive symbols — they were sorceresses, alchemists, cosmic weavers.
Her work didn’t just entertain the mind — it nourished the soul.
In Varo’s surrealism, I saw my own longing for meaning, my connection to nature and spirit, and the sense that life is mysterious but never empty. Her art didn’t just deconstruct reality — it re-enchanted it.
What Gets Left Out — And Why It Matters
The omission of female surrealists like Varo from my early art education wasn’t accidental. It’s part of a larger cultural imbalance — one that values rationality, detachment, and spectacle over intuition, emotion, and spiritual depth. The result? An impoverished vision of creativity itself — one that sees nonsense as more profound than meaning, and fragmentation as more "serious" than connection.
But we don’t have to keep living in that fragmented dream.
Perhaps it’s time to remember that artists can do more than break things apart — they can also weave things back together.
Art & Story Copyright © 2025 Eris Klein | All rights reserved.